Maffeo v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al
| Robert Maffeo |
| John Doe 1 through 3, Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv05280 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28:1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE Of Filing by Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. Civil Cover Sheet (Sheridan, Kimberly) |
Filing 3
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/08/2020.(rvb)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc. Discovery ends on 6/1/2021. (Filed in State Court)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT, filed by Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc.(Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-10548968) (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
