Connelly v. Boston Scientific Corporation
| Alberta B. Connelly |
| Boston Scientific Corporation |
| 1:2021cv00120 |
| January 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Boston Scientific Corporationwith Jury Demand filed by Alberta B. Connelly.(Neville, John) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 14
ORDER: Plaintiff's #10 motion to amend is GRANTED and Defendant's #3 motion to dismiss is now MOOT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to strike the document labeled "First Amended Complaint" at Doc. No. #9 . Plaintiff, through Counsel, shall file a First Amended Complaint on or before March 1, 2021 that corrects the deficiencies noted herein. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 2/17/2021. (jed)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE re #10 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to File Plaintiff's First Amended Compalint filed by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Cole, Brenton) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Alberta B. Connelly. (Neville, John) |
| Filing 11 Brief in Support re #10 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to File Plaintiff's First Amended Compalint filed by Alberta B. Connelly. (Neville, John) Modified on 2/8/2021 (rjs). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to File Plaintiff's First Amended Compalint by Alberta B. Connelly. (Neville, John) |
| Filing 9 ---STRICKEN PER #14 ORDER--- First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Alberta B. Connelly.(Neville, John) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified on 2/17/2021 to add red text (jed). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline by which she must respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss is EXTENDED to February 8, 2021. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/28/2021. (rjs)
|
|
Filing 7
TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 01/27/2021. (adg) (ADI)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Cole, Brenton) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Alberta B. Connelly. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Extension of Tinme for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss)(Neville, John) |
|
DOCKET ORDER re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Alberta B. Connelly. There is no indication if Defendant consents to or was consulted regarding Plaintiff's motion. In the interest of time, Defendant is DIRECTED to file a response to Plaintiff's motion by noon on Friday, January 29, 2021. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 1/27/2021. (pdw)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Boston Scientific Corporation by Boston Scientific Corporation.(Cole, Brenton) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief In Support by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support)(Cole, Brenton) |
|
Filing 2
NINTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/8/20. (eop)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Boston Scientific Corporation. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-10581740) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A -Superior Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit -B -Forsyth County Assessor's Report, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Connelly v. Boston Scientific Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Brenton Webster Cole |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alberta B. Connelly | |
| Represented By: | John Richard Neville |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
