Santry v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
Brian Shawn Santry |
Jesse A. Harris, Mark C. Adger, Bob Ellis, Naphcare, Sheriff Hicks, Natalie Hall, Theodore Jackson, Patrise M. Perkins-Hooke, Robb Pitts, Richard Anderson, Fulton County Superior Court, Fulton County, Georgia, Liz Hausmann, Marvin S. Arrington, Jr., Lee Morris, Joe Cam, Cobb County Sheriff's Department, Kaye Burwell, Sheriff Woods, Sheriff Bozich, Cobb County Police, Fulton County Jail, Belinda Edwards and Naphcare Fulton County Jail |
1:2021cv00457 |
January 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered dismissing action without prejudice. (tcc)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 8 ORDER - Plaintiff Brian Shawn Santry's Complaint #3 is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Because Plaintiff's Complaint is being dismissed, Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order #4 is DISMISSED as moot. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/17/2021. (tcc) |
Civil Case Terminated. (tcc) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brian Shawn Santry re #8 Order, #9 Clerk's Judgment. (tcc) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brian Shawn Santry re #7 Notice (Other). (tmf) |
Filing 7 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021 (adg) (ADI) |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support of #4 MOTION for Protective Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8)(jed) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to refrain from forwarding the Complaint to the United States Marshal's Service for service until the District Judge orders otherwise. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit this matter to the District Court for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/1/2021. (tmf) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Protective Order by Brian Shawn Santry. (tmf) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Brian Shawn Santry. (Attachments: #1 Ante Litem Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Submission of #4 MOTION for Protective Order, #5 Order ruling on IFP, for frivolity, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (tmf) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brian Shawn Santry re #5 Order ruling on IFP,. (tmf) |
Filing 2 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/27/21. (eop) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Brian Shawn Santry. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Ante Litem Notice, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Motion for Protective Order)(eop) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (eop) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Brian Shawn Santry re #2 Order. (eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.