Muhammad v. Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Ali S. Muhammad
Defendant: Bob Hurzeler and Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC
Case Number: 1:2021cv00626
Filed: February 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: John K Larkins
Referring Judge: Thomas W Thrash
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2021 Submission of #4 MOTION to Dismiss, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (ah)
March 11, 2021 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ali S. Muhammad re #5 Notice (Other). (ah)
March 10, 2021 Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ali S. Muhammad. (ah)
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021 (adg) (ADI)
March 5, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss with Brief In Support by Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC, Bob Hurzeler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Schnell, Grant)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER by docket entry only, granting #3 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants' answer or other response to the complaint shall be filed no later than 3/4/21. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 2/22/21. (emm)
February 18, 2021 Filing 3 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, with Brief In Support by Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC, Bob Hurzeler. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schnell, Grant)
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/27/21. (eop)
February 12, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Bob Hurzeler and Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-10717933) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
February 12, 2021 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ali S. Muhammad re #2 Order. (eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muhammad v. Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bob Hurzeler
Represented By: Grant Edward Schnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Flagship Credit Acceptance, LLC
Represented By: Grant Edward Schnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ali S. Muhammad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?