Leach v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Frank Leach, III |
| Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Andrew J. Saul |
| 1:2021cv00651 |
| February 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Clarence Cooper |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Frank Leach, III. Andrew J. Saul served on 3/15/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons US Attorney, #3 Summons General Counsel)(Blakeney, Walter) |
Filing 6
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021 (adg) (ADI)
|
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:21-cv-651-AJB. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (dob) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Office of General Counsel, Commissioner, US Attorney General, US Attorney. (dob) |
| CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Frank Leach, III. (Blakeney, Walter) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT filed by Frank Leach, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED TO FORWARD sufficient USM 285 Forms to Plaintiffs counsel. Upon receipt, Plaintiff is ORDERED to complete the forms and return them to the Clerk within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order, so that process may be served upon Defendant. Upon receipt of the forms by the Clerk, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshals Service service packages for Defendant. Upon receipt of the service packages, the U.S. Marshals Serviceis DIRECTED to serve Defendant. The completed USM 285 forms shall be filedwith the Clerk. If counsel for Plaintiff prefers, counsel may arrange for service of the complaint to Defendant without involving the U.S. Marshal. So that such service may be effected without delay, the Clerk is DIRECTED also to ISSUE electronic summonses to Plaintiffs counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 3/2/2021. (dob)
|
|
Filing 2
TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/27/21. (eop)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with IFP Affidavit In Support by Frank Leach, III. (Attachments: #1 IFP Affidavit, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Proposed Summons -4)(eop) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
