Rodriguez v. Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc.
Fabian P. Rodriguez |
Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. |
1:2021cv00848 |
February 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Mark H Cohen |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Fabian P. Rodriguez (Bertschi, Craig) |
![]() |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman terminated from case. (jpa) |
Filing 11 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. (jpa) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. (Bryant, William) Modified on 4/6/2021 to edit text (jpa). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William Randal Bryant on behalf of Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. (Bryant, William) |
![]() |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #7 APPLICATION for Admission of Michael T. Delcomyn Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10844900). Attorney Michael T. Delcomyn added appearing on behalf of Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. (cdg) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc.. (Gulas, Christina) |
![]() |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Admission of Michael T. Delcomyn Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-10844900).by Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc.. (Gulas, Christina) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Clerks Notation re #4 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Fabian P. Rodriguez. Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. served on 3/2/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. (Bertschi, Craig) |
Clerks Notation re #4 Certificate of Interested Persons--Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 3/2/2021. (cp) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Fabian P. Rodriguez. (Bertschi, Craig) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Fabian P. Rodriguez. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-10773699) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fabian P. Rodriguez | |
Represented By: | Charles Jackson Cole |
Represented By: | Craig Edward Bertschi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. | |
Represented By: | William Randal Bryant |
Represented By: | Michael T. Delcomyn |
Represented By: | Christina Lynn Gulas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.