Elkins v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc.
Mary Elkins |
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc. |
1:2021cv00988 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Clarence Cooper |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 626 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re. Defendant's Initial Disclosures by Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc..(Clarke, Matthew) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER re #11 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery ends on 10/29/2021. See Order For Details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 4/29/21. (bjh) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Serving Plaintiff's First Requests for Production of Documents by Mary Elkins.(Palazzolo, Alessandra) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Serving Plaintiff's First Interrogatories to Defendant by Mary Elkins.(Palazzolo, Alessandra) |
Filing 12 Initial Disclosures by Mary Elkins.(Buckley, Edward) |
Filing 11 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Mary Elkins. (Buckley, Edward) |
Clerks Notation re #9 Certificate of Interested Persons--Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 4/19/2021. (cp) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sasha Nina Greenberg on behalf of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc. (Greenberg, Sasha) |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons by Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc.. (Clarke, Matthew) |
Filing 8 ORDER To Show Cause. The Court has reviewed the disclosure made by Plaintiff, #7 , and hereby APPROVES it. It appears, however, that Defendant has yet to file its disclosures. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant SHALL file its certificate of interested persons / corporate disclosure statement within TEN (10) DAYS of this Order. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in sanctions, up to and including the striking of pleadings. The Clerk is DIRECTED to re-submit this Order to the undersigned for further consideration if Defendant fails to comply within the specified time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 4/15/21. (bjh) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons by Mary Elkins. (Mew, Thomas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alessandra Palazzolo on behalf of Mary Elkins (Palazzolo, Alessandra) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT and AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc.. Discovery ends on 8/27/2021.(Clarke, Matthew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Mary Elkins. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc. served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. (Buckley, Edward) |
Filing 3 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/9/2021. (eop) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Atlanta, Inc.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Mary Elkins. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-10808464) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.