Wright v. Merrick Bank et al
Dayle Wright |
Equifax Information Services, LLC and Merrick Bank |
1:2021cv01153 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Eleanor L Ross |
Russell G Vineyard |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerks Notation re #4 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosures by Dayle Wright. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Dayle Wright. (Hoover, William) |
Filing 3 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021.(rvb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC, Merrick Bank. (Attachments: #1 Summons Merrick Bank)(rvb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Dayle Wright. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10843664) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.