Wattleton v. Klein, Ph.D. et al
| David Earl Wattleton |
| John P. Daniels, M.D., Federal Bureau of Prisons Risk Assessment Panel, Emily Wakeman, Ph. D. and Melissa Klein, Ph.D. |
| 1:2021cv01304 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Linda T Walker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (ah)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to David Earl Wattleton re #8 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #9 Clerk's Judgment. (ah) |
Filing 8
ORDER adopting #5 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 5/18/2021. (ah)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (ah) |
| Submission of #5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by David Earl Wattleton, to District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr. (ah) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #5 Report and Recommendation filed by David Earl Wattleton. (ah) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to David Earl Wattleton re #6 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by David Earl Wattleton. (ah) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER for Service of #5 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 4/26/2021. (ah) Modified to edit date on 4/27/2021 (ah).
|
| Filing 5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED as frivolous. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 4/26/2021. (ah) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Service of process shall not issue until further consideration of plaintiffs complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 04/22/2021. (rvb)
|
| Submission of #1 Complaint for frivolity review, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (rvb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to David Earl Wattleton re #4 Order. (rvb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to David Earl Wattleton re #3 Order. (jkb) |
|
Filing 3
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021. (jkb)
|
| Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (jkb) |
| -DOCKETED IN ERROR -WRONG CASE-Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number AGANDC-10869290 (eop) Modified on 4/1/2021 (eop). |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Earl Wattleton. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David Earl Wattleton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
