Weans v. Swift Transportation Services, LLC et al
| Neena Lee Weans and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC |
| Swift Transportation Services, LLC doing business as Swift Transportation and John Doe Corporations 1-5 |
| 1:2021cv01674 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC.(Kalfus, Shawn) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC.(Kalfus, Shawn) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRATNING #11 Motion to Substitute Party. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC added. Swift Transportation Services, LLC terminated. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 6/1/2021. (tcc)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party Defendant Swift Transportation Services, LLC dba Swift Transportationby Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Consent Order)(Kalfus, Shawn) |
| Filing 10 Notice for Leave of Absence for the following date(s): November 22-December 3; December 22-31, by Matthew Peter Stone. (Stone, Matthew) |
| Clerks Notation re #6 Certificate of Interested Persons. Read and approved by LMM. (bnp) |
| Filing 9 Initial Disclosures by Swift Transportation Services, LLC.(Kalfus, Shawn) |
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: re: #7 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Discovery ends on 1/15/2022 with 8 month discovery track. Dispositive Motions due by 2/14/2022. Proposed Pretrial Order and Daubert Motions due by 2/14/2022 or 30 days after the entry of the Court's ruling on any dispositive motions, whichever is later. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 05/13/2021. (bdb)
|
| Filing 7 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Kalfus, Shawn) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Swift Transportation Services, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. for Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Kalfus, Shawn) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Swift Transportation Services, LLC Notice of Filing to Adverse Party (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Kalfus, Shawn) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 4/26/2021. (tmf)
|
|
Filing 3
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021.(rvb)
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand, by Swift Transportation Services, LLC. Discovery ends on 9/20/2021. (Filed in State Court)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT, filed by Swift Transportation Services, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-10923896) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit All pleadings filed in state court, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(rvb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
