Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC v. Williams
Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC |
Melba Sue Williams |
1:2021cv01893 |
May 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
John K Larkins |
Eleanor L Ross |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Remanded to Magistrate Court of Clayton County re #6 Order. (jpk) |
Filing 6 ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation. The Court REMANDS this case to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County, Georgia, and DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 6/2/2021. (jpk) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC and Melba Sue Williams re #6 Order. (jpk) |
Civil Case Terminated. (jpk) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on the #2 Notice of Removal to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (jpk) |
Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 5/7/2021. (jpk) |
Filing 3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on the #2 Notice of Removal. It is RECOMMENDED that the action be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Clayton County. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 5/7/2021. (jpk) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Melba Sue Williams. (jpk) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC and Melba Sue Williams re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #4 Order. (jpk) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Melba Williams & Rove N Rose Magmt as to Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC and Melba Sue Williams regarding #5 Order. (mlb) |
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 5/7/2021 within the #3 R&R. (jpk) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melba Sue Williams. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jpk) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (jpk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Melba Sue Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rove N Rose Magmt Co LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.