Premier Polymers, LLC et al v. Wilson et al
| Vinmar Polymers America, LLC and Premier Polymers, LLC |
| Ravago Americas, LLC and Scott Wilson |
| 1:2021cv02162 |
| May 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Ravago Americas, LLC, Scott Wilson. (Toney, Jackie) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 5/25/2021. (tmf)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Special Private Process Server by Premier Polymers, LLC and Vinmar Polymers America, LLC. (Filed in Superior Court and included with Notice of Removal) (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(eop) Modified on 5/25/2021 to correct date filed (eop). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Scott Wilson and Ravago Americas, LLC. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-10995419) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Exhibit -C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
