Nguyen et al v. Renaud
| San Hoang Nguyen, Hanh T. Le, Phuong L. Nguyen and B. H. N. |
| Tracy Renaud |
| 1:2021cv02251 |
| June 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by San Hoang Nguyen, Hanh T. Le, Phuong L. Nguyen, B. H. N.. All Defendants. (Diaz, Leslie) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by San Hoang Nguyen, Hanh T. Le, Phuong L. Nguyen, B. H. N.. All Defendants. (Diaz, Leslie) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 6/4/21. (jpa)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Tracy Renaud. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by San Hoang Nguyen, Hanh T. Le, Phuong L. Nguyen and B. H. N.. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-11010833) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Exhibit -C, #4 Exhibit -D, #5 Exhibit -E, #6 Exhibit -F, #7 Exhibit -G, #8 Exhibit -H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
