Nguyen et al v. Renaud
| Dan X. Nguyen and Huy Nguyen |
| Tracy Renaud |
| 1:2021cv02278 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER: GUIDELINES TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL PROCEEDING BEFORE THE HONORABLE AMY TOTENBERG. You are required to sign and file a Certificate of Compliance in a format consistent with the Certificate of Compliance attached hereto. To request to file material under seal, the Parties should follow the mechanism described in Section II(J) of Appendix H to the Court's Local Civil Rules. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 6/16/21. (rlb)
|
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Huy Nguyen. All Defendants. (Alwan, Zainab) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Tracy Renaud. (rlb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Huy Nguyen, Dan X. Nguyen (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11013914) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I)(rlb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
