Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. KEMG Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant: Christopher J. Berry and KEMG Inc. doing business as Opium
Case Number: 1:2021cv02293
Filed: June 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: William M Ray
Nature of Suit: Cable/Satellite TV
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 551
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 7/26/2021. (cmd)
July 23, 2021 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by KEMG Inc.. (Newby, Kenneth)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Christopher J. Berry Answer due 7/23/2021; KEMG Inc. Answer due 7/23/2021. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 6/30/2021. (tmf)
June 28, 2021 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Christopher J. Berry, KEMG Inc.. (Newby, Kenneth)
June 21, 2021 Filing 8 Return of Service Executed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. KEMG Inc. served on 6/17/2021, answer due 7/8/2021. (Reemsnyder, Ronald)
June 15, 2021 Filing 7 Return of Service Unexecuted by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. as to KEMG Inc.. (Reemsnyder, Ronald)
June 11, 2021 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. Christopher J. Berry served on 6/5/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. (Reemsnyder, Ronald)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 6/4/2021. (cmd)
June 3, 2021 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (eop)
June 3, 2021 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Christopher J. Berry. (eop)
June 3, 2021 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to KEMG Inc.. (eop)
June 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11015680) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. KEMG Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher J. Berry
Represented By: Kenneth A. Newby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEMG Inc. doing business as Opium
Represented By: Kenneth A. Newby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Represented By: Richard S. Bruno
Represented By: Ronald David Reemsnyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?