Anderson v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
Plaintiff: Nadine Anderson
Defendant: Amazon.com LLC and Adecco USA, Inc
Case Number: 1:2021cv02503
Filed: June 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Justin S Anand
Referring Judge: Steven D Grimberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE by Adecco USA, Inc of STATUS UPDATE (Eason, Leslie)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay. All proceedings in the above captioned case shall be immediately stayed pending the resolution of binding arbitration between the parties. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the case. The parties are to report on the status of the arbitration within sixty days and then every sixty days thereafter unless the case has been dismissed in the interim. In the event the action is resolved prior to completion of said arbitration proceedings, the parties shall notify this Court as soon as practicable and dismiss the above-captioned case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 10/05/2021. (jkb)
October 5, 2021 Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand terminated from case. (jkb)
October 4, 2021 Filing 5 Consent MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration by Adecco USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [proposed] Order)(Eason, Leslie)
August 13, 2021 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nadine Anderson. Adecco USA, Inc waiver mailed on 8/6/2021, answer due 10/5/2021. (Mixon, J.)
July 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Tiffany Nishkah Alaina Taylor on behalf of Adecco USA, Inc (Taylor, Tiffany)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie Kali Eason on behalf of Adecco USA, Inc (Eason, Leslie)
June 21, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nadine Anderson with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11052888) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit EEOC RTS, #3 Summons Proposed Incorrect - Adecco, #4 Summons Proposed Incorrect - Amazon, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Adecco USA, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adecco USA, Inc
Represented By: Leslie Kali Eason
Represented By: Tiffany Nishkah Alaina Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nadine Anderson
Represented By: J. Stephen Mixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?