Cargle v. Tanner et al
| Steve Cargle |
| L.T. Tanner, N.P. Njenga, R.N. Kennedy, Dr. Clopton, Dr. Smith, M. Bates, Officer Managr Brooks and L.P.N. L. Fearon |
| 1:2021cv02768 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 (construed by clerk) MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Steve Cargle. (tmf) |
Filing 4
ORDER: If Plaintiff wishes to pursue claims against someone in this action, he must, within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, file an amended complaint using the form that the Clerk of Court will send him, with the following instructions: See document for specifics. The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward Plaintiff a civil rights form so that Plaintiff may file his amended complaint. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned upon receipt of the amended complaint or at the expiration of the above-referenced time period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 9/1/2021. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Steve Cargle re #4 Order, 1 prisoner civil rights complaint. (tmf) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis: Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without paying an initial partial filing fee. However, Plaintiff shall be obligated to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 as funds are deposited in his inmate account pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. '1915(b)(2). Specifically, the balance of said filing fee shall be paid by, or on behalf of, Plaintiff, in monthly or other incremental payments in the amount of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's inmate account, in each month in which Plaintiffs account balance exceeds $10.00. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '1915(b)(2), the institution administering Plaintiff's inmate account shall withdraw such amounts from the account and remit the same to the Clerk, U.S. District Court, until the filing fee is paid in full, as verified by separate notice from the Clerk to the warden of the institution. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court transmit a copy of this Order to the warden of the institution where Plaintiff is incarcerated; and 2. The warden of the institution, or his designee, shall collect the aforesaid monthly payments from Plaintiffs inmate account and remit such payments to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Service of process shall not issue at the present time pending further consideration of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 8/12/2021. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Steve Cargle and Warden, Henry County A.D.C. re #3 Order ruling on IFP. (tmf) |
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (ceo) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Steve Cargle. (ceo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Steve Cargle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
