Jones v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
Tracy Jones |
Equifax Information Services, LLC |
1:2021cv02935 |
July 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
Eleanor L Ross |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Equifax Information Services LLC's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Discovery ends on 1/31/2022.(Barton, Eric) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #5 Defendant's consent motion for extension of time to answer. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by September 2, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 8/12/2021. (jtj) |
Clerks Notation re #6 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Barton, Eric) |
Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barton, Eric) |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Tracy Jones. Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 7/22/2021, answer due 8/12/2021. (Dakroub, Jenna) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (ceo) |
Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosures by Tracy Jones. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tracy Jones. (ceo) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Tracy Jones. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11125694) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons w/ Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ceo) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tracy Jones | |
Represented By: | Jenna Dakroub |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC | |
Represented By: | Eric F. Barton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.