Edwards v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Jonathan Edwards |
Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
1:2021cv03048 |
July 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
Mark H Cohen |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons U.S. Atty, #2 Summons Atty General)(ceo) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Jonathan Edwards (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Comerford, Ida) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Jonathan Edwards. (Comerford, Ida) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is represented by counsel and has not requested that the Court order that service of the summons and complaint be made by the United States Marshal. Counsel for Plaintiff is therefore appointed to effect service of process upon Defendant under Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 7/30/2021. (tmf) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Jonathan Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: #4 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:21-cv-3048-CCB. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (ceo) |
Summonses at #1 APPLICATION not issued. (captioned to incorrect plaintiff) (tmf) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Edwards. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons Att General, #6 Proposed Summons ORCC, #7 Proposed Summons US Att NDGA)(ayw) Modified on 7/30/2021 Proposed summons are captioned for the incorrect plaintiff (adg). |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (ayw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Edwards v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jonathan Edwards | |
Represented By: | Ida Comerford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner, Social Security Administration | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.