Teklehaymanot et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Berhe Amare Teklehaymanot and Betelihem Gatechew Worku |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Shineka Miller |
| 1:2021cv03131 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Berhe Amare Teklehaymanot. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER regarding civil litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 8/3/21. (jpa)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Shineka Miller., U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons As to Mayorkas, #2 Summons As to Miller, #3 Summons As to US Att NDGA, #4 Summons As to US Att General)(ayw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Berhe Amare Teklehaymanot, Betelihem Gatechew Worku (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11155813) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(ayw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
