Dressler v. SECO Architectural Systems, Inc. et al
Brian R. Dressler |
Seco Architectural Systems, Inc. and Joseph A. Creighton |
1:2021cv03219 |
August 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Copyright |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 8/11/2021. (rjc) |
Filing 5 AO Form 121 forwarded to Registrar. (ayw) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to SECO Architectural Systems, Inc.. (ayw) Modified on 8/20/2021 (ayw). |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Joseph A. Creighton. (ayw) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Register of Copyrights re #5 A.O. Form 121 Copyright. (ayw) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Brian R. Dressler. (ayw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Brian R. Dressler (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11167669) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Demand Letters, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ayw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.