Weiler v. A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Colleen Weiler
Defendant: A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. and John Does 1-25
Case Number: 1:2021cv03222
Filed: August 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Alan J Baverman
Referring Judge: Steven D Grimberg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Filing 9 Certification of Consent to Substitution of Counsel. Jasmine Peele replacing attorney John H. Bedard, Jr and Michael K. Chapman. (Peele, Jasmine)
September 15, 2021 Clerks Notation re #8 Corporate Disclosure Statement--Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 9/15/2021. (cp)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have through 10/6/2021 to file its response to Plaintiffs Complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 9/15/2021. (cp)
September 14, 2021 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by A.R.M. Solutions, Inc..(Peele, Jasmine)
September 14, 2021 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peele, Jasmine)
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jasmine Peele on behalf of A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. (Peele, Jasmine)
September 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bedard, Jr on behalf of A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. (Bedard, John)
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael K. Chapman on behalf of A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. (Chapman, Michael)
August 9, 2021 Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.. (eop)
August 9, 2021 Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons--Reviewed and approved by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 8/9/2021. (cp)
August 6, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Colleen Weiler. (eop)
August 6, 2021 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Colleen Weiler. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11167756) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified text on 8/9/2021 (eop).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weiler v. A.R.M. Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colleen Weiler
Represented By: Misty Oaks Paxton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A.R.M. Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Jasmine Peele
Represented By: John H. Bedard, Jr.
Represented By: Michael K. Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-25
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?