Williams v. State of Georgia et al
Michael James Williams |
State of Georgia and Warden Walter Berry |
1:2021cv03354 |
August 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Regina D Cannon |
Eleanor L Ross |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (ceo)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the R&R #2 as the opinion of this Court. For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action for lack of jurisdiction and DENIES a Certificate of Appealability. Furthermore, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to forward Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. 2254 form petition and an in forma pauperis affidavit, together with a copy of this order, for Petitioners use should he later determine that he wishes to file a federal habeas corpus petition. Lastly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 09/15/21. (ceo) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Michael James Williams re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation and #6 Clerk's Judgment. (Forms sent: 28 U.S.C. 2254 form and in forma pauperis affidavit form) (ceo) |
Civil Case Terminated. (ceo) |
Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (ceo) |
Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Michael Williams as to Michael James Williams regarding #4 Order. (mlb) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 8/23/2021. (jpk) |
Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION on the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction (without prejudice to Petitioner filing a federal habeas corpus petition), that a certificate of appealability be DENIED, and that this action be closed. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk of Court be DIRECTED to forward to Petitioner a 28 U.S.C. 2254 form petition and an in forma pauperis affidavit, together with a copy of this Order, for Petitioner's use should he later determine that he wishes to file a federal habeas corpus petition. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to withdraw the referral to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 8/23/2021. (jpk) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Michael James Williams re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #3 Order. (jpk) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and frivolity review,to Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. (ayw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael James Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ayw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.