Bah v. Mayorkas et al
| Ishmael Lieberman Bah |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Shineka Miller |
| 1:2021cv03357 |
| August 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER Regarding Civil Litigation. Ordered by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on August 19, 2021. (ash)
|
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Ishmael Lieberman Bah. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou., the U.S. Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney, NDGA (Attachments: #1 US Att General, #2 US Att NDGA)(ayw) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (ayw) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Shineka Miller. (ayw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Ishmael Lieberman Bah (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11193303) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(ayw) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
