Clark v. State of Georgia et al
Ronald Mark Clark |
State of Georgia, Christopher Lee Bishop, Sylvia Goldman, Stephanie Adreane Green, Judge Mary Staley Clark, Michael C. Jones, Central State Mental Health Hospital, Darlene Corbitt, Michael W. Almand, John T. Overrocker, Fulton County Superior Court, Judge Henry Newkirk, Fulton County District Attorney Office, Fulton County Public Defenders Office, Cherokee County Superior Court, Judge Ellen McElyea, Cherokee County District Attorneys Office, Cherokee County Sheriffs Office, All Transcribers involved that withheld Transcripts from my Court File which Judge Clark Ordered to Omit, D.A. Victor Reynolds, Anytime Bonding Surety, Cobb County Sheriffs Office, Johnson State Prison, Superior Court of North San Diego, Judge Timothy M. Casserly, North San Diego District Attorneys Office, North San Diego Public Defenders Office, Sarah Donowitz, D.A. Shannon G. Wallace, Asst D.A. Cliff Head, Rebecca Keaton, Department of Behavioral Health and Disabilities, AAOK Bail Bonds, Surety, Falcon Bonding of Cobb, LLC and Georgia Regional Mental Health Administration |
1:2021cv03396 |
August 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Justin S Anand |
Steven D Grimberg |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.