Burgest v. U.S.P. Atlanta, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta Georgia-F.B.O.P.
| Earl Hughes Burgest |
| Mrs. Hollinger, Dentist Dr. Martin, Dr. Eziakor and Dr. Tesh |
| 1:2021cv03449 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| John K Larkins |
| Prison Condition |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (tmf)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Earl Hughes Burgest re #15 Clerk's Judgment, #14 Order on Final Report and Recommendation,. (tmf) |
Filing 14
ORDER: The Court APPROVES AND ADOPTS the Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. #12 ] as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's action [Doc. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 9/14/2021. (tmf) Modified on 9/15/2021 to edit date(tmf).
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (tmf) |
| Submission of #12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Earl Hughes Burgest, to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (tmf) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Earl Hughes Burgest re #12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Earl Hughes Burgest, #13 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation,. (tmf) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER for Service of #12 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 8/24/2021. (tmf)
|
| Filing 12 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Earl Hughes Burgest. IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 8/24/2021. (tmf) Modified on 8/25/2021 to edit date(tmf). |
| FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 filed by Earl Hughes Burgest. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's IFP application #2 be DENIED. Ruled on at #12 R&R by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 8/24/2021. (tmf) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from District of South Carolina; Case Number 4:21-cv-02357. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 10 Additional Attachments to Main Document #6 Objection to Report and Recommendation. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #8 Order on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Earl Hughes Burgest, #53598-004, WFCI, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Submission of #2 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (aar) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER and OPINION: The Court ADOPTS the R & R as the Order of the Court. (Dkt. No. 4). The Court TRANSFERS this case and all filings to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 8/20/21.(ltap, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.]
|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendation by Earl Hughes Burgest. Reply to Objections due by 8/30/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) Modified on 8/23/2021. See #10 for additional attachments. (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Earl Hughes Burgest, #53598-004, WFCI, PO Box 340, Salters, SC, 29590 (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that this case and all its filings, including the Motion for informa pauperis, be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northen District of Georgia, Atlanta Division for further handling. Objections to R&R due by 8/16/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E Rogers, III on 08/02/2021. (dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Earl Hughes Burgest. Response to Motion due by 8/12/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Inquiry, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Thomas E Rogers, III.(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S.P. Atlanta, Southeast Regional Office, Atlanta Georgia-F.B.O.P., filed by Earl Hughes Burgest. Service due by 10/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(dsto, ) [Transferred from South Carolina on 8/23/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
