Norwood v. Board of Pardons et al et al
| Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. |
| Board of Pardons et al and Chair Board |
| 1:2021cv03601 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (rjc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. re #7 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (cmd) |
Filing 7
ORDER for Service of #6 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 10/6/2021. (cmd)
|
| Filing 6 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based upon Plaintiff's abuse of the judicial process. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 10/6/2021. (cmd) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. and Warden, Lee State Prison re #5 Order. (cmd) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, allowing Plaintiff to proceed IFP, however, Plaintiff is obligated to pay $350.00 as funds are deposited into Inmate account. The Warden or the designee shall collect the monthly payments and remit to Clerk until $350.00 is paid in full. Service of process shall not issue pending further consideration of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 10/5/2021. (cmd)
|
| Filing 4 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (ah) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2021: #1 Envelope) (ah). |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. re #3 Order ruling on IFP, Affidavit & Authorization form. (cmd) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Doc. #2 ]. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, he is ORDERED, within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered, to complete and submit the prisoner application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to RESUBMIT this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge upon Plaintiff's compliance with this Order or the expiration of the thirty-day time period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 9/14/2021. (Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization) (cmd)
|
| Submission of #2 Certification and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
| Filing 2 Certification and Authorization Signature for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
