Engel v. Gray Television
Plaintiff: Noel John Paul Engel
Defendant: Gray Television
Case Number: 1:2021cv03736
Filed: September 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER adopting the #2 Final Report and Recommendation and OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections thereto (Doc. No. #4 ). The Court DENIES Plaintiff's #1 IFP application as moot and DIRECTS the Clerk to (1) docket in Case No. 1:21-CV-03069 the nonduplicative documents attached to Plaintiff's Complaint in this matter and (2) administratively CLOSE this action. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 09/24/2021. (rsg)
September 24, 2021 Civil Case Terminated. (rsg)
September 24, 2021 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Noel John Paul Engel re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (rsg)
September 20, 2021 Filing 4 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation filed by Noel John Paul Engel. (tmf)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 9/9/21. (klb)
September 9, 2021 Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Noel John Paul Engel. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Mr. Engel's IFP Application be DENIED AS MOOT and that the Clerk be directed to administratively close this case and docket the documents attached to Mr. Engel's duplicative Complaint in Case No. 1:21-CV-03069-SCJ instead. Furthermore, the Court instructs Mr. Engel to file any additional documents related to his claims against Gray Television in Case No. 1:21-CV-03069-SCJ. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 9/9/21. (klb)
September 9, 2021 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Noel John Paul Engel re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #3 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (klb)
September 9, 2021 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (eop)
September 7, 2021 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Noel John Paul Engel. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit -Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Notice, Consent, Reference to a Magistrate Judge, #5 Subpoena to Produce)(eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Engel v. Gray Television
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noel John Paul Engel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gray Television
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?