Kaunda et al v. Garland et al
| Shanks Chandwira Kaunda, Jr. and Lydia Umwali |
| Merrick B. Garland, Antony Blinken and Alexandra McKnight |
| 1:2021cv03767 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Standing Order Regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 9/23/2021. (ah)
|
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland and US Atty NDGA(vs) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2021: #1 Summons) (vs). Modified on 9/13/2021 to add summons issued to US Atty NDGA(vs). |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken. (vs) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Alexandra McKnight. (vs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11251982) filed by Shanks Chandwira Kaunda, Jr., Lydia Umwali. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A April 6, 2020 Email, #2 Exhibit B Feb 8, 2021 Email, #3 Exhibit C Email to Ms. Colotl, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(vs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
