Woolford v. Highgate Hotels, L.P.
Plaintiff: Benisa Woolford
Defendant: Highgate Hotels, L.P.
Case Number: 1:2021cv04277
Filed: October 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Walter E Johnson
Referring Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed by Artur Davis. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 12/07/2021. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(ddm)
November 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Nicole Turner on behalf of Highgate Hotels, L.P. (Turner, Natalie)
November 12, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Highgate Hotels GP LLP for Highgate Hotels, L.P. by Highgate Hotels, L.P..(Shin, Gregory)
November 12, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Highgate Hotels, L.P.. Discovery ends on 4/11/2022.(Shin, Gregory) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions.
October 25, 2021 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Benisa Woolford. Highgate Hotels, L.P. served on 10/22/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. (Davis, Artur)
October 19, 2021 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #4 APPLICATION for Admission of Artur Davis Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11329468).. Attorney Jermaine A. Walker added appearing on behalf of Benisa Woolford (nmb)
October 15, 2021 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Admission of Artur Davis Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11329468).by Benisa Woolford. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
October 15, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE Of Filing by Benisa Woolford (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue)(Walker, Jermaine)
October 13, 2021 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Highgate Hotels, L.P. (vs)
October 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11323800) filed by Benisa Woolford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(vs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Woolford v. Highgate Hotels, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benisa Woolford
Represented By: Artur Davis
Represented By: Jermaine A. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highgate Hotels, L.P.
Represented By: Gregory Young Shin
Represented By: Natalie Nicole Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?