Morgan v. Bryson Constructors, Inc.
Lisa Morgan |
Bryson Constructors, Inc. |
1:2021cv04280 |
October 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Justin S Anand |
Mark H Cohen |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint,, Bryson Constructors, Inc. Answer due 1/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 11/29/2021. (dob) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Bryson Constructors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Schwartzenfeld, Dana) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Lisa Morgan. Bryson Constructors, Inc. served on 11/09/2021, answer due 11/30/2021. (Estes, Chase) Modified on 11/22/2021 to edit served and deadline dates(dob). |
Notification of Docket Correction re #5 Return of Service Executed. Pleading filed with incorrect served date. Clerk made necessary changes. (dob) |
MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Chase Estes by CRD at the direction of the Court. Approved by Judge Mark H. Cohen on November 4, 2021. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(lwb) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #4 APPLICATION for Admission of Chase Estes Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11368991). Attorney Chase Estes added appearing on behalf of Lisa Morgan (cdg) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION for Admission of Chase Estes Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11368991).by Lisa Morgan. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Chase Estes. Clerk to follow-up by 11/12/2021. (nmb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Bryson Constructors, Inc. (vs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11324592) filed by Lisa Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(vs) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morgan v. Bryson Constructors, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Morgan | |
Represented By: | Jermaine A. Walker |
Represented By: | Chase Estes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bryson Constructors, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Dana Schwartzenfeld |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.