Lang v. Jaddou
Thuy M Lang and Thuy M. Lang |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
1:2021cv04388 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Eleanor L Ross |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed on 10/22/2021 as to Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou by Thuy M. Lang. Answer due 11/12/2021. (Echols, Eli) Modified to edit text on 11/15/2021 (ceo). |
Filing 3 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (jra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Thuy M Lang. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-11344309) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Approval Notice of Plaintiffs Form I-485, Application for Adjustment of, #2 Exhibit Receipt for Plaintiffs Form I-485, Application for Adjustment of Status, #3 Exhibit Receipt for Plaintiffs Form I-824, Application for Action on an Approved, #4 Exhibit Exhibit USCIS Historical Average Processing Times, #5 Exhibit Exhibit USCIS.gov Case Processing Times for the Texas Service Center, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.