Hill v. Manning et al
| Carl M. Hill |
| S. Alexandra Manning, Scott M. Kaye, Megan Miller and Craig L. Schwall |
| 1:2021cv04549 |
| November 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Carl M. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 11/05/2021. (jkb)
|
|
Submission of #3 Complaint to District Judge Steven D. Grimberg for Frivolity Review (jkb)
|
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Carl M. Hill re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jkb)
|
|
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (eop)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Carl M. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
