Combs v. United States of America
Fontez Lamont Combs |
United States of America |
1:2021cv04640 |
November 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
J P Boulee |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (cmd)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 4 ORDER adopting #2 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Judge J. P. Boulee on 12/13/2021. (cmd) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Fontez Lamont Combs re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment. (cmd) |
Civil Case Terminated. (cmd) |
Submission of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, to District Judge J. P. Boulee. (jpa) |
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 11/15/2021 within the #2 R&R. (cmd) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Order and Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 11/15/2021. (bgt) |
Filing 2 ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is ORDERED that Petitioner be GRANTED leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of dismissal only, and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 11/15/2021. (bgt) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Fontez Lamont Combs re #2 Order and Final Report and Recommendation and #3 Order. (bgt) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (eop) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Fontez Lamont Combs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Executor Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Combs v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Fontez Lamont Combs | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.