Danforth v. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP.
| Catherine Danforth |
| Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP. and Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP |
| 1:2021cv04734 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 First AMENDED COMPLAINT For Damages against Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP.with Jury Demand filed by Catherine Danforth.(Smith, Ian) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP.. (jra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Catherine Danforth. (Filing fee $402, receipt number CGANDC-11401815) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
