Thomas v. Maury Cobb Attorney at Law, LLC et al
| Alicia Thomas |
| Maury Cobb Attorney at Law, LLC and John Does 1-25 |
| 1:2021cv04792 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Linda T Walker |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing the Clerk to Administratively Close this case due to settlement. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 1/4/2022. (dob)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker terminated from case. (dob) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Alicia Thomas (Paxton, Misty) |
| Clerks Notation re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement and #3 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by MHC. (lwb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Maury Cobb Attorney at Law, LLC. (eop) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Alicia Thomas.(eop) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Alicia Thomas. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Alicia Thomas. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11382330) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
