Wasson v. ARCPE Holding, LLC et al
| Kevin Wasson |
| ARCPE Holding, LLC, Servis One, Inc. doing business as BSI Financial Services and John Does 1-3 |
| 1:2021cv04805 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by ARCPE Holding, LLC, Servis One, Inc.. (Chaness, Bret)
|
|
Filing 12
Memorandum of Law in Opposition re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Kevin Wasson. (Hatcher, Collin) Modified on 1/10/2022 to edit text(jra).
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE re #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Kevin Wasson. (Hatcher, Collin)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Stay and Pretrial Deadlines. All discovery and other pretrial deadlines imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and Local Rules 16 and 26 (N.D. Ga.) are STAYED pending a decision by this Court on Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Should the Motion to Dismiss be denied in any part, the Parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan within 30 days of entry of the Order on the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/30/2021. (jeh)
|
|
Filing 9
Joint MOTION to Stay Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines by ARCPE Holding, LLC, Servis One, Inc., & Kevin Wasson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Consent Order Granting Motion to Stay)(Chaness, Bret) Modified on 12/29/2021 to edit text (jra).
|
|
Filing 8
Initial Disclosures by Kevin Wasson.(Hatcher, Collin)
|
|
Clerks Notation re #7 Certificate of Interested Persons. Reviewed and approved by Judge Thrash. (jeh)
|
|
Filing 7
Certificate of Interested Persons & Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kevin Wasson. (Hatcher, Collin) Modified on 12/14/2021 to edit text(jra).
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the #3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . The deadline by which Plaintiff must file his response is extended through and including January 7, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 12/7/2021. (jeh)
|
|
Filing 5
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Kevin Wasson, ARCPE Holding, LLC, & Servis One, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Hatcher, Collin) Modified on 12/7/2021 to edit text to edit text(jra).
|
|
Filing 4
Certificate of Interested Persons by ARCPE Holding, LLC, Servis One, Inc.. (Chaness, Bret)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by ARCPE Holding, LLC, Servis One, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Chaness, Bret)
|
|
Filing 2
Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARCPE Holding, LLC and Servis One, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent, BSI Financial Holdings, Inc. for Servis One, Inc.. (eop)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by ARCPE Holding, LLC and Servis One, Inc.. (Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AGANDC-11413053) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -A, #2 Exhibit -B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
