Howell v. Lazer Spot, Inc.
| Nathaniel Howell |
| Lazer Spot, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04814 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER re: #11 Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan. Per the Parties' request, the Court assigns this case to a six (6)-month discovery track, to close on July 12, 2022 Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 1/12/2022. (cmd)
|
| Filing 11 JOINT PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN filed by Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Burke, Cary) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lazer Spot, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Lazer Spot Holdings Corporation for Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Burke, Cary) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Lazer Spot, Inc.. Discovery ends on 5/13/2022.(Burke, Cary) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Cary Reid Burke on behalf of Lazer Spot, Inc. (Burke, Cary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Christopher Bartlett on behalf of Lazer Spot, Inc. (Bartlett, Brett) |
| Clerks Notation re #10 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Lazer Spot, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Lazer Spot Holdings Corporation for Lazer Spot, Inc.. Read and approved by District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Lazer Spot, Inc. answer due 12/14/2021. (ceo) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons & Complaint , as to Lazer Spot, Inc.. (Cohan, Emily) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nathaniel Howell.(Cohan, Emily) |
| Filing 3 Initial Disclosures by Nathaniel Howell.(Cohan, Emily) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Lazer Spot, Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Nathaniel Howell. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11414093) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Howell v. Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Nathaniel Howell | |
| Represented By: | Emily Cohan |
| Represented By: | Louis R. Cohan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lazer Spot, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett Christopher Bartlett |
| Represented By: | Cary Reid Burke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
