Norwood v. McMenomy et al
Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. |
Charles R. McMenomy, Tracy Drake, Melanie Bell, Henry Baker, Ezelle Brown, Samuel Ozburn, Michelle Smith, Priscilla Cooper, John L. Strauss, Gordon Clark Hall, Sherri Washington and Melissa Lester |
1:2021cv04849 |
November 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Alan J Baverman |
Leigh Martin May |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #11 MOTION for Relief from Judgment, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bgt) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. (bgt) |
Submission of #10 MOTION De Novo Review, #8 MOTION MOTION for Case Summary, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
Filing 10 MOTION for De Novo Review re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION with Brief In Support by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)(ceo) |
Filing 9 OBJECTIONS to #4 Report and Recommendation filed by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. (ceo) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Case Summary by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (rlh) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (ceo)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 6 ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court: The request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 12/21/21. (ceo) |
Civil Case Terminated. (ceo) |
Submission of #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. re #6 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #7 Clerk's Judgment. (ceo) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Service of #4 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 12/2/2021. (cmd) |
Filing 4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, [Doc. #2 ], be DENIED and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 12/2/2021. (cmd) |
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Amend. Ruled on by Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 12/2/2021 within the #4 R&R. (cmd) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr. re #4 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #5 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (cmd) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Amend by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (jra) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman. (eop) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Doyle Anthony Norwood, Sr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.