Hudson v. Walmart Inc.
| Terrion Hudson |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2021cv04855 |
| November 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Linda T Walker |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc..(Larimer, Abigail) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Walmart Inc.. Discovery ends on 6/6/2022.(Larimer, Abigail) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Walmart Inc. Answer due 1/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 12/22/2021. (jkb)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Larimer, Abigail) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Terrion Hudson. Walmart Inc. served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Davis, Artur) |
|
ORDER granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Artur Davis. Approved by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on December 2, 2021. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(ash)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #3 APPLICATION for Admission of ARTUR DAVIS Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11422370). Attorney Artur Davis added appearing on behalf of Terrion Hudson (gas) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of ARTUR DAVIS Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-11422370).by Terrion Hudson. (Walker, Jermaine) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Walmart Inc.. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Terrion Hudson. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11421445) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit -Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hudson v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Terrion Hudson | |
| Represented By: | Artur Davis |
| Represented By: | Jermaine A. Walker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Peter Reed Corbin |
| Represented By: | Abigail Jane Larimer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
