Zangaro v. Cascade Capital, LLC et al
| Donna Zangaro |
| Cascade Capital, LLC and Superlative RM, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv05145 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Walter E Johnson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Electronic Summons Issued as to Superlative RM, Inc.. (dob) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Cascade Capital, LLC. (dob) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Donna Zangaro (Berry, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Donna Zangaro (Berry, Matthew) |
| Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons reviewed by Judge Mark H. Cohen. (smj) |
| Filing 3 FILED IN INCORRECT CASE Certificate of Interested Persons by Donna Zangaro. (Berry, Matthew) Modified on 12/21/2021 (dob). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Donna Zangaro. (Berry, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Donna Zangaro. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11464492) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
