Perry v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
| Charles L. Perry and Charles Lindsey Perry, Jr. |
| Unnamed Defendant(s) |
| 1:2021cv05290 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Christopher C Bly |
| Michael L Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Macon Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 1/18/2022. (tmf)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly terminated from case. (tmf) |
| New Civil Action Number in USDC MDGA 5:22-cv-0037 (aar) |
| Case electronically transferred to USDC MDGA- Macon. (tmf) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Charles Lindsey Perry, Jr. re #2 Order. (tmf) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (abm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Charles L. Perry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(abm) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
