United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kimberly Groome, United States of America, ex rel. and Chris Purcell
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021mi00009
Filed: February 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Christopher C Bly
Referring Judge: Mark H Cohen
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2021 New Case Number in USDC EDPA 2:21-mc-0016 (aar)
February 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO TRANSFER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for disposition in connection with Case No. 2:17-cv-0 3523-MAK (E.D. Pa.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 02/23/2021. (bdb)
February 23, 2021 Miscellaneous Case Terminated. Case electronically transferred to USDC, Eastern Pennsylvania, Case Number 2:17-cv-03523-MAK. (bdb)
February 12, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE Of Filing Civil Cover Sheet by Kimberly Groome, Chris Purcell, United States of America, ex rel. (Bain, David)
February 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 TENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 1/27/21. (eop)
February 11, 2021 Filing 1 PLAINTIFFS-RELATORS' MOTION to Compel Compliance with Third Party Subpoena with Memorandum of Law In Support by Kimberly Groome and Chris Purcell. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit -A -Subpoena served on Graham Warden, #3 Exhibit -B - Email Exchange between Relators Counsel and Respondents Counsel, #4 Exhibit -C -Respondents Objections and Responses to Subpoena, #5 Exhibit -D - Roberts 1/29/21 Correspondence to Respondents Counsel, #6 Exhibit -E -Respondents Counsel 2/3/21 Correspondence to Roberts, #7 Exhibit -F -Roberts 2/4/21 Correspondence toRespondents Counsel)(eop)
February 11, 2021 Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number AGANDC-10715923 (eop)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America, ex rel. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Groome
Represented By: David Andrew Bain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Purcell
Represented By: David Andrew Bain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?