Trinet USA, Inc. v. Vensure Employer Services, Inc.
Trinet USA, Inc. |
Vensure Employer Services, Inc. |
Chuck Link and Phil Urso |
1:2021mi00028 |
April 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
William M Ray |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPLY BRIEF re #1 MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena filed by Trinet USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rosenwasser, Steven) |
Miscellaneous Case Terminated. Case converted to 1:21-cv-1835-WMR-CCB. (bdb) |
Filing 3 RESPONSE in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena filed by non-party Chuck Link and Phil Urso. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Francis, James) Modified to correct party names on 5/4/2021 (bdb). |
Submission of the #1 MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (aaq) |
Filing 2 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONA VIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 03/09/2021.(jkb) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Enforce Rule 45 Subpoena by Trinet USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) |
Filing Fee Paid: $ 49, receipt number AGANDC-10915413 (jkb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.