Clark v. Social Security Administration
| Ronald Mark Clark |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2022cv00015 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Justin S Anand |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ronald Mark Clark and Cobb County Sheriff re #3 Order ruling on IFP, #4 Order to Show Cause. (jkb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, Directing Ronald Mark Clark to pay Initial fee of $ 15.00 and to make Monthly Payments as funds are deposited into Inmate Account, allowing Plaintiff to proceed IFP, however, Plaintiff is obligated to pay $350.00 as funds are deposited into Inmate account. The Warden or the designee shall collect the monthly payments and remit to Clerk until $350.00 is paid in full. Service of Process shall not issue at present time. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge upon receipt of the partial filing fee or the expiration of the aforementioned thirty-day period. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 02/23/2022. (jkb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis, allowing Plaintiff to proceed IFP. The institution administering Plaintiff's inmate account is directed to submit the required initial partial filing fee of $15.00 to the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this Order. The Warden or the designee shall collect the monthly payments and remit to Clerk until $350.00 is paid in full. Service of Process shall not issue at present time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 01/12/2022. (jkb)
|
|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Ronald Mark Clark re #3 Order ruling on IFP, Order Directing Warden to Collect Monthly Payments from Inmate Account. (jkb)
|
|
Submission of #1 Complaint for Frivolity Review, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (jkb)
|
|
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (eop)
|
|
Filing 2
Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Ronald Mark Clark. (eop)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Ronald Mark Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Clark v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald Mark Clark | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
