Jackson v. National Association of Extradition Officials et al
| William R. Jackson |
| National Association of Extradition Officials, Brian Chambers, Stephanie Daniels, Kim Patton-Johnson and Timothy Ward |
| 1:2022cv00017 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Petitioner's #6 Objections to the Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED, the #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation is VACATED and the action is REOPENED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Warden at Rogers State Prison. The Warden (or his designee) is ORDERED, within thirty days of the date of this order, to either deduct $402.00 from Plaintiff William R. Jacksons inmate account and send it to the Clerk of this Court along with a copy of this order, or inform the Clerk via letter (that includes the case number 1:22-cv-0017-AT) that Inmate Jackson does not have sufficient funds in his account to pay the $402.00 fee. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 2/8/2022. (vs)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William R. Jackson, Warden re #7 Order. (vs) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (vs) |
| Submission of #6 Objections to Report and Recommendation, to District Judge Amy Totenberg. (vs) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation filed by William R. Jackson. (vs) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice. (cmd)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
|
Filing 4
ORDER VACATED PER ORDER DOC. #7 ORDER: the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation [Doc. #2 ] as the opinion of the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. #1 ] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 1/25/2022. (cmd) Modified on 2/8/2022 (vs).
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William R. Jackson re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment. (cmd) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (cmd) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William R. Jackson re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by William R. Jackson, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (vs) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 1/7/2022. (vs)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, RECOMMENDING that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 1/7/2022. (vs) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and Frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (eop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by William R. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
