Escalante v. Trans Union LLC et al
| Roger Escalante |
| Trans Union LLC, Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00059 |
| January 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Alan J Baverman |
| William M Ray |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Covell, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roger Escalante. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. waiver mailed on 1/7/2022, answer due 3/8/2022. (Berry, Matthew) |
| Clerks Notation re: #2 Certificate of Interested Persons. Reviewed and approved by Chief Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman on 01/09/2022. (cmb) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons by Roger Escalante. (Berry, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Roger Escalante. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11500571) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
