Harpe v. Lawler et al
| Nathaniel A Harpe |
| Tom Lawler, Wendy Mann and Richard T Alexander |
| 1:2022cv00117 |
| January 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J P Boulee |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE: Effective immediately, all communications related to cases assigned to Judge Boulee should be directed to 404-215-1410 or CRD_JPB@gand.uscourts.gov. (lwb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing re Notice (Other). (lwb) |
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge J. P. Boulee for all further proceedings. Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:22-cv-00117-JPB. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 1/12/2022. (tcc)
|
| Submission of #1 Complaint for ifp and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (tcc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Nathaniel A Harpe re #2 Order Reassigning Case. (tcc) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker for IFP determination. (jra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
