Buckhead City Committee v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
Buckhead City Committee |
City of Atlanta, Georgia and Mayor Andre Dickens |
1:2022cv00234 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Buckhead City Committee. City of Atlanta, Georgia waiver mailed on 1/27/2022, answer due 3/28/2022; Andre Dickens waiver mailed on 1/27/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Lemond, G.) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 1/21/2022. (bnp) |
Filing 2 -DOCKETED IN ERROR -Electronic Summons Issued as to City of Atlanta, Georgia. (eop) Modified on 1/21/2022 (eop). |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to City of Atlanta, Georgia. (eop) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Buckhead City Committee. (Filing fee $402.00, receipt number AGANDC-11530949) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -1, #2 Exhibit -2, #3 Exhibit -3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(eop) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.