Bowman v. Colonial Pipeline Company
Lisa Bowman |
Colonial Pipeline Company |
1:2022cv00287 |
January 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Christopher C Bly |
William M Ray |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Persons by Colonial Pipeline Company. (Peterson, Kurt) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM with Brief In Support by Colonial Pipeline Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint)(Peterson, Kurt) |
Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #8 Defendant's Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant shall have through and including March 22, 2022, to respond to the complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 3/01/2022. (jtj) |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Colonial Pipeline Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saltzman, Aaron) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS #6 Defendant's consent motion for extension of time to answer. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint by March 8, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 2/14/2022. (jtj) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Colonial Pipeline Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Saltzman, Aaron) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Isadore Saltzman on behalf of Colonial Pipeline Company (Saltzman, Aaron) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kurt Peterson on behalf of Colonial Pipeline Company (Peterson, Kurt) |
Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Lisa Bowman. Colonial Pipeline Company served on 2/1/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. (Walker, Jermaine) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Colonial Pipeline Company. (jra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lisa Bowman. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-11538528) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right To Sue, #2 Exhibit Amended EEOC Charge, #3 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bowman v. Colonial Pipeline Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa Bowman | |
Represented By: | Jermaine A. Walker |
Represented By: | Shahrzad Bagheri |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Colonial Pipeline Company | |
Represented By: | Aaron Isadore Saltzman |
Represented By: | Kurt Peterson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.